Spine Solutions, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The ‘objective’ prong of Seagate tends not to be met where an accused infringer relies on a reasonable defense to a charge of infringement.”
• “The ‘objective’ prong of Seagate tends not to be met where an accused infringer relies on a reasonable defense to a charge of infringement.”
• because patent owner did not sell any products, patent owner was not entitled to lost profits damages for any lost profits suffered by sister companies that sold patented products

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).