Windy City Innovations, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• direct infringement claim sufficiently plead where “the Complaint 14 describes (i) the Accused Instrumentalities and the functionalities of those products which 15 allegedly infringe on plaintiff’s patents and (ii
• “[D]efendant’s argument that it should be entitled to notice at the pleading stage of which specific products infringed on which specific claims in the patents is belied by both the local patent rules and Federal Circuit authority.”’
• “Additionally, defendant’s argument that it should be entitled to notice at the pleading 3 stage of which specific products infringed on which specific claims in the patents is belied by both 4 the local patent rules and Federal Circuit authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sionyx, LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.
  District of Columbia· 2018-08-30· cited 23×
• Rah Color Technologies LLC v. Ricoh USA Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-07-07· cited 7×
• Smart Wearable Technologies Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc.
  W.D. Virginia· 2017-04-06· cited 4×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Papasan v. Allain
  Supreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 9,423×
• Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police Agent
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-05-11· cited 5,771×
• In Re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-08-11· cited 1,361×
• Conservation Force v. Salazar
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-07-22· cited 783×
• Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.
  Supreme Court· 2011-05-31· cited 600×
• R+L Carriers, Inc. v. DriverTech LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2012-06-07· cited 353×
• Vita-Mix Corp. v. Basic Holding, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-09-16· cited 189×
• Walker Digital, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2012-04-04· cited 32×
• Rembrandt Social Media, LP v. Facebook, Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 2013-06-12· cited 15×
• Macronix International Co. v. Spansion Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 2014-03-10· cited 9×