Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 10/22/2015

Vyshedsky v. Soliman (In re Soliman)

Citations

  • 539 B.R. 692

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that unless issue preclusion bars its assertion, “a debt- or may raise self-defense as an affirmative defense to a non-dischargeability claim”
  • finding that the debtor’s claim of self-defense in biting plaintiff’s nose amounts to an admission of willfulness
  • rejecting the debtor’s claim of self-defense, finding instead that the debtor was responsible for putting himself in the situation and could have avoided any confrontation by retreating
  • finding act of biting to not be a enable act of self-defense
  • “Since New York recognizes self-defense as a possible defense to a criminal assault charge, a guilty plea precludes a criminal defendant from later asserting self-defense in a civil assault case, or as here, as a defense to a denial of discharge”
  • examining self-defense under federal common law and New York law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Vyshedsky v. Soliman (In re Soliman)

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.