Tenth Circuit· 2/3/2004
Panalis v. Moore (In Re Moore)
Citations
- 357 F.3d 1125
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1621
- 42 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 134
- 2004 WL 198307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there must be proof of both a “willful act” and “malicious injury” to establish nondischargeability under Section 523(a)(6)
- “Without proof of [a willful act and malicious injury] . . . an objection to discharge under [§ 523(a)(6)] must fail.”
- “Without proof of both, an objection to discharge under that section must fail.”
- “Without proof of both, an objection to discharge under that section must fail.”
- “Without proof of both, an objection to discharge under that section must fail.”
- debtor's actions that caused the injury must be both willful and malicious
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Porfilio, Hartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cadwell v. Joelson (In Re Joelson)Tenth Circuit· 2005-10-24· cited 73×
- Jendusa-Nicolai v. LarsenSeventh Circuit· 2012-04-18· cited 73×
- Steier v. BestSixth Circuit· 2004-06-30· cited 72×
- In Re Jacqueline Duncan, Debtor. James Duncan, Administrator of the Estate of Meigan Lin Duncan, A/K/A Yang Chun Song v. Jacqueline DuncanFourth Circuit· 2006-05-24· cited 69×
- Cody Farms, Inc. v. Deerman (In re Deerman)D. New Mexico· 2012-10-24· cited 40×
- Bank Calumet v. Whiters (In Re Whiters)N.D. Indiana· 2006-02-02· cited 31×
- McCain Foods USA Inc. v. Shore (In Re Shore)Tenth Circuit· 2004-12-01· cited 23×
- Vyshedsky v. Soliman (In re Soliman)S.D. New York· 2015-10-22· cited 21×
- Vyshedsky v. Soliman (In re Soliman)S.D. New York· 2014-09-04· cited 18×
- Gross v. Osborne (In re Osborne)D. New Mexico· 2014-10-31· cited 18×
- Bauer v. Colokathis (In Re Colokathis)D. Massachusetts· 2009-09-21· cited 17×
- Monsanto Co. v. Wood (In Re Wood)W.D. Tennessee· 2004-04-14· cited 17×
- Bertone v. Wormington (In re Wormington)W.D. Oklahoma· 2016-08-12· cited 17×
- Burris v. Burris (In re Burris)W.D. Oklahoma· 2019-03-15· cited 16×
- Sonny Penix v. Parra (In re Parra)D. New Mexico· 2012-09-18· cited 15×
- Sierra Chemicals, LLC v. Mosley (In re Mosley)D. New Mexico· 2013-11-13· cited 15×
- Utah Behavior Services, Inc. v. Bringhurst (In re Bringhurst)D. Utah· 2017-06-30· cited 15×
- Trustmark Nat'l Bank v. Tegeler (In re Tegeler)S.D. Texas· 2018-06-08· cited 15×
- Tulsa Spine Hospital, LLC v. Tucker (In Re Tucker)E.D. Oklahoma· 2006-07-25· cited 14×
- Merritt v. Rizzo (In Re Rizzo)N.D. Illinois· 2006-01-27· cited 9×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court· 1998-03-03· cited 2,007×
- In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn CampbellSixth Circuit· 1999-09-23· cited 375×
- In Re Keith WALKER, Debtor. Frank B. HOPE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Keith WALKER, Defendant-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1995-03-30· cited 248×
- Clough v. RushTenth Circuit· 1992-03-18· cited 99×
- Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc. v. Longley (In Re Longley)Tenth Circuit· 1999-07-09· cited 98×
- Connolly v. Harris Trust Co.Tenth Circuit· 2002-10-31· cited 86×
- Lampe v. Williamson (In Re Lampe)Tenth Circuit· 2003-06-03· cited 58×
- White v. MunizSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-04-17· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.