Skip to main content
· 2/3/2004

Panalis v. Moore (In Re Moore)

Citations

  • 357 F.3d 1125
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1621
  • 42 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 134
  • 2004 WL 198307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there must be proof of both a “willful act” and “malicious injury” to establish nondischargeability under Section 523(a)(6)
  • “Without proof of [a willful act and malicious injury] . . . an objection to discharge under [§ 523(a)(6)] must fail.”
  • “Without proof of both, an objection to discharge under that section must fail.”
  • “Without proof of both, an objection to discharge under that section must fail.”
  • “Without proof of both, an objection to discharge under that section must fail.”
  • debtor's actions that caused the injury must be both willful and malicious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Porfilio, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.