Skip to main content
· 5/18/2007

Lubit v. Chase (In Re Chase)

Citations

  • 372 B.R. 125
  • 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 1653
  • 2007 WL 1470466

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “causes of action for ‘false pretenses’ and ‘false representations’ … are two distinct actions; the former involves implied misrepresentations, while the latter deals with expressed, either oral or written, misrepresentations”
  • “causes of action for ‘false pretenses’ and ‘false representations’ under § 523(a)(2)(A) are two distinct actions; the former involves implied misrepresentations, while the latter deals with expressed, either oral or written, misrepresentations”
  • “[A] false pretense is designed to convey an impression without an oral representation.”
  • “The three terms used in § 523(a)(2)(A) embody different concepts.... ”
  • “A court can find a false representation if the plaintiff presents proof that the defendant (1) made a false or misleading statement; (2) with the intent to deceive; and (3) in order for the plaintiff to turn over money or property to the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin Glenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.