Jendusa-Nicolai v. Larsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, “[w]here the officers’ entitlement to qualified immunity depends on the resolution of disputed issues of fact in their favor, and against the non-moving party, summary judgment is not appropriate”
• explaining that while the appellate court cannot resolve factual disputes on interlocutory appeal, it may “determine if the denial of qualified immunity was proper by assuming the version of events offered by the non-moving party”
• rejecting qualified immunity appeal due to factual dispute where “there is no question whether the officers’ actions .. . violated clearly established law”
• comparing the accused officers’ shooting of a fellow officer they mistook for a suspect to the officer’s shooting in Jensen
• comparing the accused officers’ shooting of a fellow officer they mistook for a suspect to the officer’s shooting in Jensen
• addressing whether an officer’s actions were objectively reasonable in mistaken- identity shooting of fellow officer without specifically addressing the initial seizure question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).