Vero Technical Support, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting motion to dismiss where claim pending in District Court had been dismissed but time for appeal had not run
• “The right to an appeal, if still available and not renounced by plaintiff, is part of an ongoing suit or process initiated by plaintiff in the District Court, for which reason, plaintiffs claim is still ‘pending’ for purposes of a section 1500 analysis.”
• “The right to an appeal, if still available and not renounced by plaintiff, is part of an ongoing suit or process initiated by plaintiff in the District Court, for which reason, plaintiff’s claim is still ‘pending’ for purposes of a section 1500 analysis.”
• “The right to an appeal, if still available and not renounced by plaintiff, is part of an ongoing suit or process initiated by plaintiff in the District Court, for which reason, plaintiffs claim is still ‘pending 1 for purposes of a section 1500 analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brandt v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2013-03-26· cited 237×
• Kaw Nation of Oklahoma v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2012-02-29· cited 17×
• Tallacus v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-06-30· cited 5×
• Brandt v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-11-30· cited 4×
• Parker v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2017-01-31· cited 4×
• Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Co. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2014-08-28· cited 2×
• Rohland v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2018-01-26
• Zainulabeddin v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2018-06-20
• Ammon v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2019-03-07

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Scheuer v. Rhodes
  Supreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
• Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2006-02-22· cited 6,493×
• Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 5,652×
• Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 2,587×
• Briscoe v. LaHue
  Supreme Court· 1983-03-07· cited 2,053×
• Carey v. Saffold
  Supreme Court· 2002-06-17· cited 1,072×
• Keene Corp. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1993-05-24· cited 894×
• Rick's Mishroom Service, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2008-04-02· cited 505×
• Gene A. Folden, Coastal Communications Associates, and Judith A. Longshore v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2004-08-16· cited 445×
• John D. Holley v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1997-11-20· cited 403×
• McZeal v. Sprint Nextel Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-09-14· cited 385×
• Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1994-09-29· cited 351×
• Briscoe v. Lahue
  Seventh Circuit· 1981-10-27· cited 293×
• Fanning, Phillips and Molnar v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
  Federal Circuit· 1998-11-12· cited 285×
• John C. Boyle, Paintiff-Appellant v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2000-01-11· cited 277×
• Boise Cascade Corporation v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2002-09-03· cited 252×
• Bradley v. Chiron Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 1998-02-20· cited 250×
• United Pacific Insurance Company, Reliance Insurance Company, and Reliance National v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2006-09-20· cited 202×