California Supreme Court· 6/23/2014

Verdugo v. Target Corp.

Citations

59 Cal. 4th 312
327 P.3d 774
173 Cal. Rptr. 3d 662
2014 WL 2808965
2014 Cal. LEXIS 4319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a retailer did not owe a common law duty to acquire and make available an AED to a patron
holding that a retailer did not owe a common law duty to acquire and make available an AED to a patron
cited by the dissent and concluding that while it was rejecting the argument that a retailer had a specific, bright-line duty to have AEDs, the court was not addressing whether the retailer could breach its duty of reasonably care by failing to do more than summon paramedics

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cantil-Sakauye, Werdegar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Verdugo v. Target Corp.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.