LA FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC. v. Mayer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that review of a trial court’s ruling regarding the existence of a duty of care is de novo
• holding that because of the nature of the relationship between a commercial business and its client, the fitness club had no duty to provide defibrillators
• holding that duty is a “question of law to be determined solely by the court.”
• requiring that a voluntarily undertaken duty “be performed in accordance with an obligation to exercise reasonable care”
• explaining that there was no duty to have CPR-trained employees at the gym
• collecting cases and arguing “non-medical employees certified in CPR remain laymen and should have discretion in deciding when to utilize the procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).