California Supreme Court· 8/3/2020
Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.
Citations
- 9 Cal. 5th 1130
- 470 P.3d 571
- 266 Cal. Rptr. 3d 665
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding 20 that for at-will contacts, a plaintiff must also allege the defendant engaged in an independently 21 wrongful act
- elements of tortious interference with contractual relations and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage claims
- “[T]o state a claim for interference with an at-will contract by a third party, the 18 plaintiff must allege that the defendant engaged in an independently wrongful act.”
- “[W]e [have] rejected the argument that section 16600 only voids restraints that entirely prohibit an employee from engaging in a profession and not less restrictive limitations that are reasonable.”
- “[T]o 27 state a claim for interference with an at-will contract by a third party, the plaintiff must 1 Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 902 P.2d 740, 748, 751 (Cal. 1995
- “We 22 therefore hold that to state a claim for interference with an at-will contract by a third party, the 23 plaintiff must allege that the defendant engaged in an independently wrongful act.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Djeneba Sidibe v. Sutter HealthNinth Circuit· 2024-06-04· cited 13×
- Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. Malwarebytes, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2023-06-02· cited 11×
- Whitewater West Industries v. AlleshouseFederal Circuit· 2020-11-19· cited 9×
- Honey Bum, LLC v. Fashion Nova, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2023-03-22· cited 7×
- Salsberg, C. v. Mann, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-09-15· cited 1×
- Caliber Paving Co. v. Rexford Industrial Realty and ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-09-01
- Focus Financial Financial Partners, LLC v. HolsoppleCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2020-11-02
- Quidel Corporation v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal· 2020-11-06
- Coast Hematology Oncology etc. v. Long Beach Memorial etc.California Court of Appeal· 2020-12-15
- Lee v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2021-06-16
- Drink Tank Ventures v. Real Soda in Real BottlesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-11-10
- Drink Tank Ventures LLC v. Real Soda in Real Bottles, Ltd.California Court of Appeal· 2021-12-02
- In re Cesar G.California Court of Appeal· 2022-02-10
- Pech v. DonigerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-02-18
- California Business & Industrial Alliance v. BecerraCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-06-30
- Ahn v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal· 2023-07-05
- Beautycon Media ABC Trust v. New General Market Partners, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware· 2023-08-11
- Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc. v. Anthony MackCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2023-09-01
- Gener8, LLC and Symbient Product Development, LLC v. Scott CastanonCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2023-09-29
- Tait v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal· 2024-06-28
Cites
59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 1,269×
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court· 1915-11-01· cited 1,066×
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court· 2003-03-03· cited 855×
- People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court· 2009-03-30· cited 591×
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court· 1998-09-23· cited 514×
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-06-13· cited 495×
- Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1980-05-01· cited 445×
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court· 1990-06-07· cited 397×
- United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court· 1911-05-29· cited 356×
- Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 288×
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2000-07-31· cited 283×
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-12-09· cited 279×
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1946-09-20· cited 226×
- Duggin v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia· 1987-10-09· cited 214×
- Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-07-24· cited 209×
- Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLPCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-08-07· cited 202×
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-04-29· cited 178×
- Reeves v. HanlonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-08-12· cited 154×
- Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc.California Supreme Court· 2007-02-15· cited 138×
- ZB, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2019-09-12· cited 136×
Other cases named Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.