California Supreme Court· 6/30/2005
Morris v. De La Torre
Citations
- 113 P.3d 1182
- 30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 173
- 36 Cal. 4th 260
- 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5851
- 2005 Daily Journal DAR 8050
- 2005 Cal. LEXIS 7058
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- duty to take reasonable and minimally burdensome measures to protect customers from ongoing criminal activity extends “to areas within the proprietor’s control ” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: George, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Delgado v. Trax Bar & GrillCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-06-30· cited 167×
- Carlsen v. KoivumakiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-07-07· cited 89×
- Jolyn Cullum v. Jan McCoolTennessee Supreme Court· 2013-12-18· cited 73×
- Verdugo v. Target Corp.California Supreme Court· 2014-06-23· cited 58×
- Margaret W. v. Kelley R.California Court of Appeal· 2006-05-05· cited 50×
- Rotolo v. San Jose Sports & Entertainment, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-05-24· cited 47×
- Ambriz v. KelegianCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-01-24· cited 47×
- The Retirement Group v. GalanteCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-07-30· cited 33×
- Barber v. ChangCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-06-13· cited 22×
- Gartin v. S & M NuTec LLCC.D. California· 2007-04-04· cited 18×
- Williams v. Fremont Corners, Inc.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-06-24· cited 9×
- Toomer v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2010-08-18· cited 6×
- Vasilenko v. Grace Gamily ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-06-17· cited 4×
- Espinosa v. KirkwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-06-23· cited 1×
- Regents v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal· 2015-10-07
- Williams v. Fremont Corners, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2019-07-18
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-03-09
- Hanouchian v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-06-24
- Dix v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2020-10-26
- Brown v. USA TaekwondoCalifornia Supreme Court· 2021-04-01
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-08-08· cited 1,329×
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-12-16· cited 411×
- Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-02-28· cited 274×
- Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2004-05-06· cited 262×
- Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-09-06· cited 208×
- Delgado v. Trax Bar & GrillCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-06-30· cited 167×
- Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1966-08-15· cited 109×
- Kentucky Fried Chicken of California, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-01-06· cited 78×
- Southland Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-08-05· cited 48×
- Marois v. Royal Investigation & Patrol, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1984-11-28· cited 34×
- Andrews v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-09-12· cited 31×
- Walsh v. C & K MARKET, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-27· cited 17×
- Young v. Desert View Management Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1969-07-29· cited 14×
- Farrier v. LevinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-12-30· cited 11×
- Forrand v. Foodmaker, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1986-06-10· cited 10×
- Johnston v. FontanaLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-12-23· cited 9×
- Hassoon v. ShamiehCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-05-10· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.