Skip to main content
· 2/9/1993

Valerie Watterson v. Eileen Page

Citations

  • 987 F.2d 1
  • 25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 424
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2029
  • 1993 WL 23908

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district courts may consider official public records in addressing a motion to dismiss
  • holding that public records and other essential documents submitted by plaintiffs may be considered as part of the pleadings
  • holding that New Hampshire law prohibits a person seeking to rescind a contract from treating the contract as simultaneously rescinded and binding
  • holding that public records and other essential documents submitted by plaintiffs may be considered as part of the pleadings
  • recognizing that “documents the authenticity of which are not disputed by the parties” may be considered on a motion to dismiss
  • concluding that court could consider official public records submitted with plaintiff’s opposition when ruling on Rule 12(b)(6) motion without converting motion to one for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Campbell, Boudin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.