First Circuit· 6/28/2002

Carroll v. Xerox Corp.

Citations

294 F.3d 231
59 Fed. R. Serv. 164
13 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 396
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 12852
2002 WL 1370805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that it is insufficient to merely submit evidence of medical diagnosis without evidence that extent of limitation caused by impairment in terms of plaintiffs own experience is substantial
explaining that a complaint will withstand a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss if it “alleges facts sufficient to make out a cognizable claim”
stating that a reasonable accommodation claim consisted of the first two elements of a disparate treatment claim plus a distinct third element
explaining that one way to prove disability is to demonstrate a mental or physical impairment that substantially limits one or more of plaintiff’s major life activities
concluding plaintiff did not establish stress as a disability because it did not significantly restrict employee from working altogether, rather just his particular position at a particular period in time
explaining that the ADA’s “disability requirement can be satisfied by demonstrating a physical or mental impairment that substantially limited one or more of [the plaintiff’s] major life activities” (citing 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2)(A))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Lipez, Woodlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

219 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.