Skip to main content
· 3/7/1999

DM Research, Inc. v. College of American Pathologists

Citations

  • 170 F.3d 53
  • 1999 WL 104446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that discovery was not warranted at the motion to dismiss stage
  • explaining that the complaint must “allege a factual predicate concrete enough to warrant further proceedings”
  • explaining that the complaint must “allege a factual predicate concrete enough to warrant further proceedings”
  • explaining that the complaint must “allege a factual predicate concrete enough to warrant further proceedings”
  • explaining that the complaint must “allege a factual predicate concrete enough to warrant further proceedings”
  • explaining that the complaint must “allege a factual predicate concrete enough to warrant further proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Gibson, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.