Supreme Court· 3/27/2002

Barnhart v. Walton

Citations

535 U.S. 212
122 S. Ct. 1265
152 L. Ed. 2d 330
2002 U.S. LEXIS 2145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an agency-interpretation established through less formal means than “notice and comment rule-making” may still be afforded judicial deference
holding that the “‘12 month’ duration requirements apply to both the ‘impairment’ and the ‘inability’ to work requirements.”
holding that the “‘12 month’ duration requirements apply to both the ‘impairment’ and the 28 | ‘inability’ to work requirements”
holding that the “‘12 month’ duration requirements apply to both the ‘impairment’ and the ‘inability’ to work requirements.”
holding that the Social Security Act requires both the impairment and the subsequent inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity to last twelve months to meet the durational requirement
holding that the Social Security Act requires both the impairment and the subsequent inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity to last twelve months to meet the durational requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breyer, Scalia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

418 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.