G.L. v. Ligonier Valley School District Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if liability is proven for denial of a FAPE at a due process hearing, parents of a child identified as having special education needs may seek compensatory education for a period equal to the period of deprivation
• finding that an inconsistency in another part of Section 1415 was the result of a drafting error
• explaining that the House version had used the occurrence rule and identifying errors in conforming that version to the Senate's
• explaining that application of the discovery rule is the “default”
• explaining “a due process complaint must be presented ‘within 2 years’ of a parent’s reasonable discovery date” but remedies are not “limited to injuries that occurred ‘not more than [two] years before’ that date”
• “IDEA parents must file their due process complaint within two years of the date they ‘knew or should have known’ of the violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).