Skip to main content

Upton v. State

Citations

  • 36 S.W.3d 740
  • 343 Ark. 543
  • 2001 Ark. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that precustodial Miranda warnings were sufficient when the defendant was questioned by the same officer after arrest, confessed within two hours of being given the warnings, and there was no evidence that the defendant did not understand the warnings
  • Miranda warnings and waiver were continually effective even though defendant’s status changed from that of voluntary, potential witness to that of a suspect in custody
  • Miranda warnings and waiver were continually effective even though defendant’s status changed from that of a voluntary, potential witness to that of a suspect in custody
  • conducting factsensitive analysis to determine sufficiency of pre-custodial warnings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert L. Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.