Skip to main content

Riggs v. State

Citations

  • 3 S.W.3d 305
  • 339 Ark. 111
  • 1999 Ark. LEXIS 558

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is incumbent on defense counsel to request the trial court to conduct a probative-prejudicial weighing with respect to evidence if the defense considers such weighing to be important or legally required
  • holding that it is incumbent on defense counsel to request the trial court to conduct a probative-prejudicial weighing with respect to evidence if the defense considers such weighing to be important or legally required
  • explaining that section 501.014(e) withdrawal order is civil in nature and authorized by government code section 501.014
  • noting that a general or imprecise objection is sufficient only if the legal basis for the objection is obvious to the trial court and opposing counsel
  • suggesting in a footnote that trial testimony cannot be relied on for suppression purposes
  • \Rational response to questioning is a legitimate factor for the trial court to consider.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert L. Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.