United States v. Pungitore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• urging close supervision by district court of defense claims of prosecutorial misconduct
• permitting convictions of both substantive and conspiracy violations under § 1962(c) and (d)
• refusing to expand application of Rule 44(c) beyond its plain meaning
• “We are bound, after a jury has delivered a guilty verdict, to interpret the evidence in a light most favorable to the government.”
• “[Ejxtortion was only one of the 32 predicate acts which the jury found that [the defendant] had committed. Thus, even if we deleted the [extortion count], we would affirm the convictions.”
• indictment silent on how County defrauded of any property rights; dismissal proper because it charged mail fraud based on scheme to defraud government of honest services of employees, agents, and consultants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Pungitore

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Pungitore
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-08-05· cited 13×
• United States v. Pungitore
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-05-20· cited 7×