United States v. Chhien

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that investigatory officers may shift the focus in order to remain responsive to emerging facts
• recognizing that the inquiry into whether the facts adequately supported a Terry stop is informed by the nature and quality of the intrusion
• recognizing that the inquiry into whether the facts adequately supported a Terry stop is informed by the nature and quality of the intrusion
• recognizing that investigatory officers may shift the focus in order to remain responsive to emerging facts
• recognizing \rare circumstances[] where non- controlling but persuasive case law suggests\ deviating from binding circuit precedent
• finding Peterson not inconsistent with Fiore and noting, inter alia, that “[ujnlike commercial burglary, ... the breaking and entering charge in Peterson did not require proof of specific intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).