State v. Lewis
Citations
- 333 Conn. 543
Syllabus
The defendant, who was convicted, on a conditional plea of nolo contendere, of carrying a pistol without a permit and criminal possession of a pistol or revolver, appealed from the judgment of conviction, claiming, inter alia, that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress a gun found on his person during a patdown search by a police officer. The defendant contended that the officer's seizure of him and patdown were unlawful under the federal and state constitutions. A woman, V, had called 911 at approximately 4 a.m. to report a domestic assault. V indi- cated to the 911 dispatcher that, approximately fifteen minutes before- hand, a black man identified as ''O,'' whom V had been ''dealing with,'' broke a window in her apartment and choked her. V noted to the dispatcher that O was wearing black clothing and a fitted orange and grey hat. V further explained that O had left her apartment but that she could hear him talking outside of her open window and, thus, believed that he was still nearby. V also told the dispatcher that O did not have any weapons. Approximately five minutes after the 911 call, police officers were dispatched to respond to the scene. The officers were informed that it was a domestic violence incident involving choking and that the perpetrator was likely in the area of the apartment, and they were given a description of O and what he was wearing. The officer who ultimately conducted the patdown search had been on patrol nearby in his police vehicle when he responded to the call. Approximately one minute after the dispatch call, the officer observed the defendant standing alone in a parking lot area that was in close proximity to the apartment, talking on a cell phone with no one else around, while it was raining heavily. Believing that the defendant matched the description of the perpetrator, the officer stopped and, while remaining in the vehi- cle, asked the defendant his name. When the defendant did not respond, the officer exited
Judges: Robinson; Palmer; McDonald; D’Auria; Mullins; Ecker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,950×
- Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 1,709×
- Mattos v. AgaranoNinth Circuit· 2011-10-17· cited 478×
- Utah v. StrieffSupreme Court· 2016-06-20· cited 423×
- Fletcher v. Town of ClintonFirst Circuit· 1999-11-08· cited 337×
- Maureen Tierney, for Herself and as Mother of Philip T. Newton, Patrick J. Newton v. Joel R. Davidson Thomas E. Williams, State of VermontSecond Circuit· 1998-01-07· cited 259×
- People v. MascarenasColorado Court of Appeals· 1998-11-13· cited 233×
- State v. StovallSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-01-28· cited 225×
- State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-25· cited 219×
- State v. JanuszewskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-08-19· cited 184×
- State v. BishopIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 158×
- United States v. William ColonSecond Circuit· 2001-05-14· cited 157×
- United States v. Alan N. ScottFirst Circuit· 2001-10-30· cited 154×
- United States v. William Edward RichardsonSixth Circuit· 2004-09-24· cited 137×
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-25· cited 112×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.