United States v. WR Grace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that whether an expert’s opinion testimony satisfies Rule 702 “requires consideration of the overall sufficiency of the underlying facts and data”
• emphasizing, as an alternative to excluding evidence, “the potential efficacy of a limiting instruction”
• “The expert is, in the first instance, the judge of what resources would help him to form an opinion, and he can filter out as irrelevant prejudicial information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).