Ninth Circuit· 8/27/2013
United States v. Joseph Evans, Sr.
Citations
- 728 F.3d 953
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing exclusion of evidence for abuse of discretion and whether a constitutional violation occurred de novo
- “Weighing probative value against 28 unfair prejudice under Rule 403 means probative value with respect to a material fact if the 1 evidence is believed, not the degree the court finds it believable.”
- “Weighing probative value against 25 unfair prejudice under Rule 403 means probative value with respect to a material fact if the 26 evidence is believed, not the degree the court finds it believable.”
- “Weighing probative value against 25 unfair prejudice under Rule 403 means probative value with respect to a material fact if the 26 evidence is believed, not the degree the court finds it believable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fisher, Gould, Paez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Avila v. Los Angeles Police DepartmentNinth Circuit· 2014-07-10· cited 43×
- United States v. Heidi HaischerNinth Circuit· 2015-03-25· cited 31×
- United States v. Velazquez-FontanezFirst Circuit· 2021-07-27· cited 30×
- United States v. Michael LindsayNinth Circuit· 2019-07-23· cited 23×
- Engilis v. Monsanto CompanyNinth Circuit· 2025-08-12
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 2,913×
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 2,639×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- United States v. HinksonNinth Circuit· 2009-11-05· cited 2,227×
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-05-02· cited 2,215×
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 1,952×
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 923×
- United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionNinth Circuit· 2000-02-18· cited 496×
- Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1996-12-17· cited 402×
- Avila v. Willits Environmental Remediation TrustNinth Circuit· 2011-01-27· cited 304×
- United States v. Raul Lopez-AlvarezNinth Circuit· 1992-07-08· cited 249×
- Zicherman Ex Rel. Estate of Kole v. Korean Air Lines Co.Supreme Court· 1996-01-16· cited 241×
- Alcala v. WoodfordNinth Circuit· 2003-06-27· cited 204×
- Trigueros v. AdamsNinth Circuit· 2011-09-14· cited 202×
- United States v. Jorge Alberto AlatorreNinth Circuit· 2000-08-16· cited 156×
- United States v. Michael H. Boulware, United States of America v. Michael H. BoulwareNinth Circuit· 2004-09-14· cited 151×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.