Rex K. DeGEORGE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the strict rules governing mandamus prevent parties from \eviscerat[ing] the statutory scheme established by Congress to strictly circumscribe piecemeal appeal\
• explaining that the strict rules governing mandamus prevent parties from “eviscerat[ing] the statutory scheme established by Congress to strictly circum- scribe piecemeal appeal”
• explaining that the strict rules governing mandamus prevent parties from “eviscerat[ing] the statutory scheme established by Congress to strictly circumscribe piecemeal appeal”
• denying mandamus petition because the district court faced a “difficult” issue that was “a question of first impression” that had divided lower courts
• noting that the purpose of statutory interpretation is to uncover congressional intent
• applying this standard of review to a district court’s statutory interpretation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).