Skip to main content
· 6/21/2000

United States v. Francisco Mateo-Mendez

Citations

  • 215 F.3d 1039
  • 54 Fed. R. Serv. 1088
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 6631
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4973
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14337
  • 2000 WL 791232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that district court’s factual findings on the relevant issue were “unequivocal”
  • “The de novo standard applies when issues of law predominate in the district court’s evidentiary analysis, and the abuse-of- 8 discretion standard applies when the inquiry is ‘essentially factual.’”
  • questions of law are reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, O'Scannlain, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.