· 6/21/2000
United States v. Francisco Mateo-Mendez
Citations
- 215 F.3d 1039
- 54 Fed. R. Serv. 1088
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 6631
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4973
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14337
- 2000 WL 791232
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that district court’s factual findings on the relevant issue were “unequivocal”
- “The de novo standard applies when issues of law predominate in the district court’s evidentiary analysis, and the abuse-of- 8 discretion standard applies when the inquiry is ‘essentially factual.’”
- questions of law are reviewed de novo
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reinhardt, O'Scannlain, Schwarzer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.