David B. Lowry v. Jo Anne Barnhart, in Her Capacity as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Dan Hyatt Riley Atkins Bennett Engelman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an “indirect and incidental burden on professional practice is far too removed from a complete prohibition to support a due process claim”
• holding that an “indirect and incidental burden on professional 15 practice is far too removed from a complete prohibition to support a due process claim”
• explaining that appellate courts generally will consider only those facts and documents that have been preserved in the dis- trict court record
• noting that “the Ninth Circuit has determined the HALLEX does not impose ‘judicially enforceable duties””
• stating that a court may allow the parties to supplement the record where supplementary material would “render a controversy moot and thus divest us of jurisdiction”
• stating that a court may allow the parties to supplement the record where supplementary material would “render a controversy moot and thus divest us of jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).