In Re NTP, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, under the substantial evidence standard of review, “[t]his court does not reweigh evidence on appeal, but rather determines whether substantial evidence supports the [PTAB’s] fact findings”
• holding “what a reference teaches” is question of fact
• holding “what a reference teaches” is question of fact
• finding substantial evidence sup ported the Board’s determination that a document’s earliest reliable date was as reported in the document—rather than an earlier, pre-critical date reported by inventors
• “Keeping in mind that these are anticipation, Case: 24-2119 Document: 48 Page: 6 Filed: 06/09/2026 6 GOOGLE LLC v. SONOS, INC. not obviousness rejections, the failure to disclose this claim element requires reversal of these rejections.”
• We do “not reweigh evidence on appeal, but rather determine ] whether substantial evidence supports the [PTAB’s] fact findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).