Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ninth Circuit· 8/16/2006

United States v. MacIel-vasquez

Citations

  • 458 F.3d 994
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a sentencing court is not required to state why it chose a particular sentence rather than other potential sentences
  • concluding that we are bound to follow Almendarez- Torres until the Supreme Court expressly overrules it
  • “[W]e reject Maciel’s argument that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is unconstitutional.”
  • “[W]e reject Maciel’s argument that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is unconstitutional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Gould, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. MacIel-vasquez

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.