United States v. Grajeda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming a Fourth Amendment violation in an initial search, but holding subsequent search validated by intervening voluntary consent
• assuming a Fourth Amendment violation in an initial search, but holding subsequent search validated by intervening voluntary consent
• assuming the existence of a Fourth Amendment violation in considering whether a defendant’s voluntary consent purged the taint of the alleged violation
• unnecessary to address whether the act amounted to an illegal search because, even assuming a Fourth Amendment violation, subsequent search was validated by intervening voluntary consent
• “Where the initial search is invalid, the fruit of that unlawful search must be suppressed unless the evidence resulted from an intervening independent act of free will[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).