· 10/15/1998
United States v. William T. Mack
Citations
- 159 F.3d 208
- 50 Fed. R. Serv. 281
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 26022
- 1998 WL 716905
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no error where instruction is not a statement of law but only an explanation of what defendant would have stated had he testified
- factual question reviewed for clear error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Suhrheinrich, Daughtrey, Gilman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.