Skip to main content
· 10/15/1998

United States v. William T. Mack

Citations

  • 159 F.3d 208
  • 50 Fed. R. Serv. 281
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 26022
  • 1998 WL 716905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no error where instruction is not a statement of law but only an explanation of what defendant would have stated had he testified
  • factual question reviewed for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Suhrheinrich, Daughtrey, Gilman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.