Skip to main content
· 6/30/1995

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,794 United States of America v. William Edward Rebrook, III

Citations

  • 58 F.3d 961
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16114
  • 1995 WL 385967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court did not err in refusing to permit counsel to par- ticipate directly in voir dire concerning pretrial publicity
  • finding that part-time attorney for state’s lottery commission held sensitive position when he used confidential information to purchase shares in a company that would be awarded a state contract
  • reviewing decision to apply the enhancement for clear error because it “turns primarily on fact”
  • reciting the elements of wire fraud without including materiality
  • attorney for the state’s lottery commission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luttig, Williams, MacKenzie, Eastern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.