United States v. Javier Robles-Pantoja

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding proper prosecutor’s statements about career implications for testifying agents because based on “the kind of common sense and knowledge of the natural tendencies and inclinations of human beings that juries are properly allowed to consider”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).