Skip to main content
· 4/27/2012

Wee Care Child Center, Inc. v. Lumpkin

Citations

  • 680 F.3d 841
  • 2012 WL 1448317
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no abuse of discretion where district court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims after dismissing federal claims
  • finding no abuse of discretion where the district court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims after dismissing the federal claims
  • “As Wee Care’s one federal claim was properly dismissed, it was likewise proper for the district court to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims.”
  • “adverse effects suffered by an individual competitor cannot establish an antitrust injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, McKeague, Zatkoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.