Ninth Circuit· 11/26/2008
United States v. Weyhrauch
Citations
- 548 F.3d 1237
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 24248
- 2008 WL 5003366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e turn for guidance in construing the statute to our pr e-McNally case law and any relevant post -McNally decisions, and then consider pre- and post- McNally decisions from our sister circuits.”
- “[W]e turn for guidance in constru- ing the statute to our pre-McNally case law and any relevant post-McNally decisions, and then consider pre- and post- McNally decisions from our sister circuits.”
- “We are persuaded that Congress’ intent in reinstating the honest services doctrine after McNally was to bring at least the two core categories of official misconduct, [ (1) taking a bribe or otherwise being paid for a decision while purporting to be exercising independent discretion and (2
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Tashima, Fisher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 987×
- United States v. GreenNinth Circuit· 2010-01-22· cited 68×
- United States v. BahelSecond Circuit· 2011-10-26· cited 66×
- United States v. Kincaid-ChaunceyNinth Circuit· 2009-02-20· cited 58×
- United States v. InzunzaNinth Circuit· 2011-04-12· cited 42×
- United States v. Steven TerrySixth Circuit· 2013-02-14· cited 30×
- United States v. GarridoNinth Circuit· 2013-04-15· cited 30×
- United States v. RingDistrict of Columbia· 2009-06-25· cited 22×
- United States v. InzunzaNinth Circuit· 2009-09-01· cited 19×
- United States v. SmithS.D. New York· 2014-04-04· cited 17×
- People v. MurrellSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2012-06-18· cited 10×
- United States v. RuizTenth Circuit· 2009-12-29· cited 7×
- United States v. PresgravesW.D. Virginia· 2009-08-25· cited 3×
- United States v. SaathoffS.D. California· 2010-04-06
- United States v. HarrisNinth Circuit· 2009-02-27
- United States v. RobinsonSecond Circuit· 2026-06-16
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-24· cited 1,314×
- Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-11-07· cited 390×
- United States v. GraceNinth Circuit· 2008-05-15· cited 279×
- United States v. Francisco Javier Alvarez, A.K.A. Frank Javier Alvarez, United States of America v. Richard ValenzuelaNinth Circuit· 2004-02-25· cited 231×
- United States v. Jerry R. BohonusNinth Circuit· 1980-03-27· cited 210×
- United States v. Charles W. Walker, Sr.Eleventh Circuit· 2007-07-06· cited 116×
- United States v. Michael Bryant BrumleyFifth Circuit· 1997-07-23· cited 105×
- United States of America, Plaintiff--Appellee/cross v. Swaran Kumar Jain Center for Mental Health Services, Inc., Defendants--Appellants/crossEighth Circuit· 1996-10-22· cited 101×
- United States v. Ruel Antonio WallaceNinth Circuit· 2000-07-07· cited 101×
- United States v. Charles Edward Louderman, United States of America v. Jacquelyn Mary Louderman, AKA Jackie WilliamsNinth Circuit· 1978-06-16· cited 95×
- United States v. Robert M. CochranTenth Circuit· 1997-03-25· cited 69×
- United States v. SorichSeventh Circuit· 2008-04-15· cited 66×
- United States v. Elton E. Bryan, A/K/A ButchFourth Circuit· 1995-08-22· cited 64×
- United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Karen Eccles, Cross-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1988-07-01· cited 62×
- United States v. John Anthony WilliamsNinth Circuit· 2006-03-21· cited 43×
- United States v. UrciuoliFirst Circuit· 2008-01-18· cited 39×
- United States v. NguyenNinth Circuit· 2006-10-17· cited 37×
- United States v. Peter A. MurphyThird Circuit· 2003-03-19· cited 36×
- United States v. WeyhrauchNinth Circuit· 2008-09-08· cited 2×
Other cases named United States v. Weyhrauch
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.