S.D. New York· 4/4/2014

United States v. Smith

Citations

985 F. Supp. 2d 547
2014 WL 2025994
2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

denying motion 1 to dismiss honest services wire fraud counts of indictment for insufficient particularity even though 2 one alleged conspiracy did not name political party officials
“[I]t is not only the language of a statute that can provide the requisite fair notice; judicial decisions interpreting that statute can do so as well”
“[I]t is not only the language of a statute that can provide the requisite fair notice; judicial decisions interpreting that statute can do so as well.”
“[I]t is not only the language of a statute that can provide the requisite fair notice; judicial decisions interpreting that statute can do so as well.”
“[I]t is not only the language of a statute that can provide the requisite fair notice; judicial decisions interpreting that statute can do so as well.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

132 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.