United States v. Bahel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a payment to the United Nations was a “benefit” since it was aimed to advance government’s ongoing foreign policy objectives
• finding that a payment to the United Nations was a “benefit” since it was aimed to advance government’s ongoing foreign policy objectives
• explaining that the honest services fraud statute applies not only to government and private sector employees, but employees of international organization as well
• examining as a legal matter whether the United Nations Participation Act, 22 U.S.C. § 287e, established a benefit program for the purpose of § 666(b)
• approving the district court’s estimate of the amount of .restitution for .loss of honest service because it would be “unduly complex” to determine the exact amount
• “U.N. rules . . . inform[ed] the contours of the duty Bahel owed to his employer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).