United States v. Charles W. Walker, Sr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an honest services fraud 15798 UNITED STATES v. WEYHRAUCH conviction “does not require proof of a state law violation”
• upholding enhancement for a state legislator who embezzled money from a charity he administered with “no oversight”
• affirming honest services mail fraud conviction where a state legislator failed to properly disclose his financial dealings with a hospital in his annual financial disclosure statements
• finding a prima facie case when the defense used all of its strikes against white people and removed over half of the white jurors on the venire
• declining to decide whether combined race-gender groups are cognizable under Batson after explaining that the United States Supreme Court has not yet decided the issue, state courts are divided on the issue, and the issue is in flux in federal circuit courts
• declining to decide whether combined race-gender groups are cognizable under Batson after explaining that the United States Supreme Court has not yet decided the issue, state courts are divided on the issue, and the issue is in flux in federal circuit courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).