United States v. Jerry R. Bohonus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “that depriving an employer of one’s honest services and of its right to have its business conducted honestly can constitute a ‘scheme to defraud’”
• involving an employee’s deceitful concealment of secret profits from his employer
• “The specific intent requirement [in § 1343] is an aspect of the ‘scheme to defraud’ requirement; i.e., there is no fraudulent scheme without specific intent.”
• “The requisite ‘scheme or artifice to defraud’ is found in the deprivation of the public’s right to honest and faithful government.”
• “The requisite ‘scheme or artifice to defraud’ is found in the deprivation of the pub- lic’s right to honest and faithful government.”
• prosecution must prove that mail fraud defendant acted with intent to defraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).