United States v. Malcolm Jones Whitebird

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant has no constitutional or statutory right to the appointment of counsel in connection with a § 3582(c)(2) motion
• holding that defendant had no statutory right to appointed counsel in connection with motion to modify sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
• affirming the denial of a § 3582(c)(2) motion where “implicitly, the district court considered at least some of the factors set forth in § 3553(a)”
• “The appointment of counsel in these in- stances is a matter within the sound discretion of the district court.”
• “The appointment of counsel in these in- stances is a matter within the sound discretion of the district court.”
• “The appointment of counsel in these in- stances is a matter within the sound discretion of the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).