Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 3/3/2008
United States v. Webb
Citations
- 66 M.J. 89
- 2008 CAAF LEXIS 274
- 2008 WL 583760
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Prior to authentication, a military judge has authority under Article 39(a), UCMJ, ‘to convene a post-trial session to consider newly discovered evidence and to take whatever remedial action is appropriate.’” (citing United States v. Scaff, 29 M.J. 60, 66 (1989))
- re-stating constitutional and statutory rights to discovery and disclosure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stucky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. BehennaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2012-07-05· cited 66×
- United States v. LukeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2011-01-25· cited 21×
- United States v. Master Sergeant TIMOTHY B. HENNISArmy Court of Criminal Appeals· 2016-10-06· cited 9×
- United States v. Sergeant ROBERTO E. TRIGUEROSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals· 2010-03-29· cited 6×
- United States v. Private RONALD GRAYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals· 2017-05-09· cited 4×
- United States v. First Lieutenant MICHAEL C. BEHENNAArmy Court of Criminal Appeals· 2011-07-21· cited 3×
- United States v. Ward, Jr.Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2014-07-31
- United States v. TsoNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2016-02-29
- United States v. HutchinsNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2018-01-29
- United States v. ArnoldtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2019-12-12
- United States v. BraimerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2021-03-29
- <p data-block-key=\56na8\>U.S. v. HIRST</p>Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2024-09-04
- <p data-block-key=\h5zj3\>U.S. v. HIRST</p>Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2024-09-25
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- United States v. HumpherysCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2002-07-23· cited 320×
- United States v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2004-08-18· cited 220×
- United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1995-09-13· cited 164×
- United States v. Melvin D. Wallace and Arthur M. LevinD.C. Circuit· 1992-06-02· cited 146×
- United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2004-03-23· cited 137×
- United States v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2003-06-25· cited 105×
- United States v. NaultUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1978-04-03· cited 47×
- United States v. GriffithUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1988-09-28· cited 40×
- United States v. ScaffUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1989-09-26· cited 33×
- United States v. BrickeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1983-09-06· cited 29×
- United States v. WitherspoonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1983-09-06· cited 24×
- United States v. MeghdadiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2005-02-11· cited 19×
- United States v. GonzalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1993-09-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.