Eleventh Circuit· 12/8/2006

Christopher Barbour v. Michael Haley

Citations

471 F.3d 1222
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 30116
2006 WL 3526934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the prisoners’ claim that they had been denied meaningful access to the courts implicated both the First and Fourteenth Amendments
providing that the actual-injury element requires the plaintiff to “identify within his complaint[ ] a nonfrivolous, arguable underlying claim” (alteration added)
providing that the actual-injury element requires the plaintiff to “identify within his complaint[] a nonfrivolous, arguable underlying claim” (alteration added)
noting that the prisoners’ claim that they had been denied meaningful access to the courts implicated both the First and Fourteenth Amendments
noting that prisoners’ claim that they had been denied meaningful access to the courts implicated both the First and Fourteenth Amendments
observing that “while Bounds clearly recognized the value that lawyers and trained paralegals might add to an access program for indigent inmates, Bounds nonetheless contemplated a legal access program that could meet constitutional demands without the provision of counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Dubina, Vinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.