United States v. Warren James Sharp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant could not be ordered to make restitution based on entire $8,500,000 wire fraud scheme when he pleaded guilty to only one count of wire fraud alleging a $3,000 fraudulent transfer
• \We therefore hold that Hughey overrules Pomazi with regard to restitution under the VWPA.\
• “We therefore hold that Hughey overrules Pomazi with regard to restitution under the VWPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).