Skip to main content
· 7/17/1995

United States v. James Earl Smith

Citations

  • 60 F.3d 595
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1195
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5493
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 9369
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17169
  • 1995 WL 416891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because Rule 11(c)(1) was violated and the error was not harmless, [defendant] must be allowed to replead.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Leavy, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.