Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 874 S.W.2d 674
  • 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 39
  • 1994 WL 101103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that section 11(a) contains a broad grant of,authority but section 11(b) \imposes limitations on the types of payments that can be ordered as a condition of probation\
  • discussing Utah’s statute authorizing the trial court to order restitution for conduct which the defendant agreed to make restitution as part of a plea agreement
  • due process requires a factual evidentiary basis in the record for the amount of restitution ordered
  • cannot order restitution to persons other than the victims of the offense for which the defendant was convicted
  • restitution may not be awarded to victim of crime for which defendant has not been convicted
  • “[I]n the context of the probation statute as a whole, we think it logical to conclude that subsection (b)’s limitation of restitution to ‘the victim’ refers to the victim of the crime for which the defendant has been charged, convicted, and sentenced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maloney, Baird, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

85 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.