United States v. Francisco Alonso Portillo-Cano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant’s right to appeal was not waived when his plea did not conform to the requirements of Rule 11
• holding that waiver of right to appeal will not preclude an appeal where defendant’s plea allocution did not con- form to the requirements of Rule 11
• holding that an appeal waiver was not valid because the defendant had not been given a description of the nature of the charges against him in violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
• holding that an appeal waiver was not valid because the defendant had not been given a description of the nature of the charges against him in violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
• reasoning that a waiver of appeal may be found invalid when the 12 defendant challenges compliance with Rule 11 procedure
• stating that where plea agreement is voluntary and taken in compliance with Rule 11, then waiver of appeal is valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).