United States v. Ralph J. Silkowski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that relevant conduct under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(2) includes conduct outside of the period charged in the indictment
• suggesting that restitution may be based only on conduct within the applicable statute of limitations unless the offense is a continuing offense
• permitting the district court, following defendant's § 641 plea, to consider all nine years of fraudulent receipt of SSI for sentencing purposes but only the five years preceding the indictment for restitution purposes
• “different considerations” govern the scope of conduct relevant to restitution, in contrast to the scope of the relevant conduct provision in the Guidelines
• \different considerations\ govern the scope of conduct relevant to restitution, in contrast to the scope of the relevant conduct provision in the Guidelines
• losses \directly caused by conduct within the temporal limits of the offense of conviction\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).