· 2/10/2003
United States v. Todd Penna
Citations
- 319 F.3d 509
- 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1240
- 2003 Daily Journal DAR 1575
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2207
- 2003 WL 262213
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a district court loses jurisdiction to act under Rule 35 after the seven-day time limitation expires
- holding that a district court loses jurisdiction to act under Rule 35 after the seven-day time limitation expires
- concluding that the district court lacked authority under Rule 36 to change a five-year sentence to a ten-year sentence
- “Rule 36 is a vehicle for correcting clerical mistakes but it may not be used to correct judicial errors in sentencing.”
- “Rule 36 is a vehicle for correcting clerical mistakes but it may not be used to correct judicial errors in sentencing.”
- seven-day limitation in Rule 35 for correcting sentence is strict jurisdictional requirement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reinhardt, O'Scannlain, Paez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.