Skip to main content
· 2/10/2003

United States v. Todd Penna

Citations

  • 319 F.3d 509
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1240
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 1575
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2207
  • 2003 WL 262213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court loses jurisdiction to act under Rule 35 after the seven-day time limitation expires
  • holding that a district court loses jurisdiction to act under Rule 35 after the seven-day time limitation expires
  • concluding that the district court lacked authority under Rule 36 to change a five-year sentence to a ten-year sentence
  • “Rule 36 is a vehicle for correcting clerical mistakes but it may not be used to correct judicial errors in sentencing.”
  • “Rule 36 is a vehicle for correcting clerical mistakes but it may not be used to correct judicial errors in sentencing.”
  • seven-day limitation in Rule 35 for correcting sentence is strict jurisdictional requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, O'Scannlain, Paez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.