United States v. Arleno Moreno Inocencio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that revocation of naturalization is “a mandatory chore” following a conviction under § 1425 and that “the purpose of 8 U.S.C. § 1451(e) is to ensure the automatic revocation of naturalization upon a conviction” under § 1425
• lack of jurisdiction to reopen case didn’t preclude court performing ministerial function revoking convicted defendant’s naturalization
• \Revocation of naturalization is mandatory upon conviction of naturalization fraud in violation of section 1425; Congress plainly contemplated that district courts having jurisdiction over criminal trials would automatically revoke naturalization upon such convictions.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).