Skip to main content
· 12/26/2001

United States v. Kenneth A. Wisch

Citations

  • 275 F.3d 620
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 27163
  • 2001 WL 1646781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing Rule 35(c), which was designated as Rule 35(a) in 2002 and initially carried seven‐day limit until extended to 14 days in 2009
  • Rule 35(c) does not permit court “to reimpose sentences based upon a subsequent change of heart”
  • “[A] court’s failure to rule is functionally equivalent to an outright denial on the merits, thus making the judgment final on the date the district judge’s power to alter the sentence expired.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Coffey, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.