Skip to main content
· 10/10/1997

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael Thomas COLACE, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 126 F.3d 1229
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8066
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 13023
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 28648
  • 1997 WL 638633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determination to be made based on \convergence of factors\ and the \totality of the circumstances\
  • determination to be made based on “convergence of factors” and the “totality of the circumstances”
  • “[W]hen the oral sentence is illegal, the correction procedure of [Federal] Rule [of Criminal Procedure] 35(c) applies, and the correction supersedes the erroneous oral sentence.”
  • imposition of wholly probationary sentence clear error, and correction occurred within seven days
  • defendant robbed at least twelve banks in a two-month period
  • defendant robbed at least twelve banks in a two-month period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Fletcher, Kozinski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.